Hello,
I wouldn't say that toll free numbers are unnecessary because some people still do not have free long-distance service.
Colleen, N8TNV;
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Stanga <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Sunday, May 18, 2014 09:45:50 PM
Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
>
>
> I gave the toll free number just in caseCarolyn wanted it.
> I too have unlimited long distance. I guess toll free numbers are almost
> becoming unnecessary.
>
> Jim
> WA5VYL
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Behler
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 9:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
>
> As a more enlightened addendum to my last post, I guess I should say that I
> never knew the ARRL had an 888 toll-free number.
>
> Guess I'm just too used to having unlimited long-distance calling here at
> the home QTH.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Tom Behler
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 9:18 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
>
> Jim:
>
> This is interesting.
>
> Your number differs from the one I gave out. ... And, I just used the number
> several weeks ago when I renewed my license.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Jim Stanga
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 8:31 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
>
> Hello:
>
> The toll free number for ARRL in the US is 888-277-5289
> --
> 73
>
> Jim
> WA5VYL
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: carolyn johnson
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 7:32 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you have a number for them? I'd like to see it go back into circulation
> again.
>
> Carolyn Kj4vt
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:40 PM
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
>
> > Carolyn:
> >
> > Probably your best and quickest course of action at this point would
> > be to call the ARRL for assistance.
> >
> > Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: For blind ham radio operators
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > On Behalf Of carolyn johnson
> > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:11 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Old Re-assigned calls
> >
> > I'd like to report my husbands death from several months ago, this way
> > his call can go into the call pool. Why should it just set there not
> > being used?
> >
> > I have no idea what to do. I tried qrz, and it asks me for a password,
> > and I don't have one. He did, and got on their all the time, but I
> > have no idea what it was. If anyone wants his call, I'll give it to
> > you, and you can ask for it. I'll send all the proof that's needed.
> >
> > Carolyn Kj4vt
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 6:05 PM
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Old Re-assigned calls
> >
> >ar Hi, all.
> >ar
> >ar
> >ar
> >ar The discussion of old re-assigned calls gets me thinking:
> >ar
> >ar
> >ar
> >ar I have always wanted the call K9DOG when or if it becomes available
> >ar during my lifetime, but I can't even begin to imagine the amount of
> >ar competition I would have in trying to get it. (huge smile)
> >ar
> >ar
> >ar
> >ar Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> >ar
> >ar
|