Yeah, I agree, John.  There are plenty of other ways to send files  to folks
as well, so I agree;  the attachment thing does not have to be an issue.

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 9:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?

The attachment thing is not a problem, that's how all lists except those
specifically for sharing files should be. Allowing attachments to an email
list is just an invite for problems, in fact I'd leave the list if they
allowed attachments.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?


>I didn't think we were talking about creating another completely 
>different  list. ... Just a new list to replace this one.
>
> Am I interpreting things incorrectly here?
>
> Actually, I agree with Mark.
>
> As I have said so many times already, this list is a great list, and 
> is by far the best and most friendly list I have ever belonged to.
>
> I understand issues like the = 20 problem, the length limit for posts, 
> and the  inability to attach documents to posts.
>
> But, in my view, there may be ways around the problems.
>
> I am not at all opposed to change, but I also abide by the principle 
> that "If It ain't broke, don't try to fix it!".  (smile)
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>