BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:32:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Tom,

From everything I've heard, the extraneous character problem can't be solved 
by individuals, which is what's causing the frustration.  If someone knows 
of an effective solution, please share with the rest of us.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Brennan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 09:59
Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?


> This is a well over done but somewhat interesting thread.  The problems 
> seem to
> be with a small number of people who are complaining about message 
> formatting.
> The solution seems to be to create a new list just because of those few 
> folks.
> It seems that it would be far easier for those folks to solve the problem 
> from
> their end rather than disrupt a list which is running well and has run 
> well for
> years.
>
> Another consideration is the loss of privacy that moving the list to 
> someone
> like Yahoo will involve.  It almost seems as though people don't care 
> about such
> these days but there are enough of us on the list who are older who I 
> would
> think would be concerned about this.
>
> My vote would be to leave well enough alone.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2