Ron, My feelings precisely!  What's the matter with the list the way it is.
This is the best list I've ever been on and it's been going for a long time.
I have no complaints.  

My feeling is if there is something about this list someone doesn't like,
then go somewhere else and start another list if you want to, but let's
leave this one alone. 

Kris

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Ron Yearns
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 8:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?

Again why is it we wish to move?  As some as said if it isn't broke leave it
alone.
Ron

--------------------------------------------------
From: "KK4AHX Darren Duff" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 8:04 PM
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: New blind-hams list?

> I vote for keeping this one. Don't see a problem with it.
>
>
>
> 73.
> Darren Duff.
> amateur radio station KK4AHX.
>
> Cherokee Amateur Radio Society.
> http://www.cherokeehams.com
>
> Cherokee County ARES.
> http://www.cherokee-ares.org
> When all else fails, Amateur Radio
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Buddy Brannan
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 7:59 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: New blind-hams list?
>
> Just wondering if anyone would be interested, opposed, predisposed, = 
> whatever to a new home for this list, or a new list? I=92m not sure if 
> = this list has a moderator or not, but one thing to doesn=92t have is 
> a = sensible way of handling modern 8-bit plain text encoding. It 
> isn=92t = just me either, seems more people are using Macs and iThings 
> to post = here, thus more of the text that this listserv just does not 
> grok. I=92ve = got the capability to host such a thing. Heck, I=92ll 
> host it and = someone else can moderate/administer/whatever it if the 
> membership so = deems.=20=