BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David W Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 1 Dec 2013 07:03:26 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (192 lines)
Hi

I have now used the R8 for nearly twelve years, 120 or so yards away from
the sea with occasional 60 mile and hour winds, and it is still working
well.
It is guyed at 20 feet.

We used one for the GB90 MGY station to good effect.

73

ATB

David W Wood 
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Phil Scovell
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 4:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: The R7 cushcraft vertical antenna

I ran the R7 on my roof at 20 feet, base above ground, for many years and 
was very happy with its performance.  I'd like having the R9 now.  I've run 
other trapped verticals that used full length radials at 20 feet but feel 
the R7 was much better even with the short 4 and 5 foot radials poking out 
of the base.  I wouldn't run a vertical ground mounted.  Even ten feet off 
the ground is better but in places where I had no room, I ground mounted 
them and got out well.  For 18 months, I ran a trapped ground mounted 
vertical and a 2 watt transceiver and worked all 50 states including both 
KH6 and KL7 on 40 meters so ground mounting, even using long ground rods 
instead of radials, works better than most people think.

K0NX
Phil.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Shaffer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: Observations about a cushcraft vertical antenna


>I was looking at Cushcraft's site, and as far as I can tell, they make the
> R-8 and R-9 verticals now.  The R8 is 6 through 40 meters, and the R-9 
> adds
> 80 meters.  I searched for the R-5, but didn't find it, so guess they're 
> not
> making it any more.  I suppose some dealers might have them around though.
> --
> Jim, KE5AL
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Jim Gammon
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:44 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Observations about a cushcraft vertical antenna
>
> Yes, I think it's an r-5 and I think they are still made, but not
> sure.  A ham friend gave me his old one which seems to be working
> fine.  Has a little weathering, but works well on all the bands
> it's made for.  73, Jim WA6EKS
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Fred Adams <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:02:56 -0500
> Subject: Re: Observations about a cushcraft vertical antenna
>
> The cushcraft vertical sounds like it might be a cushcraft R-5,
> R-7 or R-8
> antenna.  These antennas had counter poise radials and did not
> use ground
> radials.  I had all of these antennas at different times and
> talked all
> over the world with them.  I don't believe cushcraft makes them
> any longer.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Jim Gammon
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:28 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Observations about a cushcraft vertical antenna
>
> Just some preliminary unscientific observations.  I have been
> using a
> Cushcraft vertical on 20 through 10 meters for a couple of months
> now.
> Sorry, I don't remember the model number.  It is mounted on a ten
> foot
> steel post behind our garage and has its own ground rod, but only
> small
> radials on the antenna itself.
> The bottom of the antenna is just a couple feet above the garage
> roof.  The
> antenna has a match box at the feed point where the coax connects
> at the
> bottom.  Sorry I can't remember the model, a ham friend gave me
> this used
> antenna.  Anyway, my point is that it's my first use of a
> vertical on HF
> and is not as noisy as I expected it would be.  I also have a
> DXCC dipole
> that works  on the same bands and I can switch from one to the
> other
> antenna for noise and signal comparison.  I can't really tell
> much
> difference between the two antennas so far.  73, Jim WA6EKS
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Miller <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:00:39 -0500
> Subject: Re: Question about antennas
>
> I have the 5BTV ground mounted and honestly I don't really see it
> being as
> noisy as I expected hearing my whole time as a ham how noisy
> verticals are.
> Height might make a difference but with being in a trailer park
> and all
> buildings being the same height, I'd have to guide it like crazy
> if I went
> above the roof.  I did think about it.  I have it guided now with
> very
> light rope tied to the house and shed but still half of it is
> above the
> roof line of all buildings in this area for miles so when we get
> wind, it
> sure gets the worst of it.  I did it to be safe.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Basden" <[log in to unmask]
> To: <[log in to unmask]
> Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 12:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Question about antennas
>
>
> I used the 4BTV with four radials on each band on my rooftop and
> it  worked
> extremely well.  It was noisy like all verticals, but DX was
> readily
> available.
>
> 73,
>
> Dave, W7OQ
>
> At 09:25 AM 11/29/2013, you wrote:
> I have the Alpha Delta DX-EE, and it's a good dipole.  I've had
> good luck
> with it for the past few years, even though I have it in my
> attic.  I
> haven't used one that's exposed to the elements though, so I
> can't tell you
> how it holds up under adverse weather.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr.  Ronald E.  Milliman
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 11:15 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Question about antennas
>
> Is there anyone here on our list personally familiar with either
> of these
> antennas, and if so, what feedback can you give me about them?
>
> 1.  The Alpha Delta DX-EE
>
> Description: Alpha Delta "ISO-RES" inductors replace lossy traps
> and
> capacitors, rated for Full Power; Direct 50 ohm feed, no antenna
> tuner is
> required except for extended frequency coverage; Fully assembled
> with
> insulated #12 copper wire, stainless hardware and 50 ft.  of
> nylon rope;
> Includes the DELTA-C static protected center insulator and
> DELTA-CIN end
> insulators; Installs horizontally OR as an inverted V; covers:
> 40-20-15-10M
> plus 30-17-12M using a Wide Range Tuner, 40' Multi-band Antenna.
>
>
> 2.  Hustler 4BTV -- 4 Band Trap Vertical
>
> Description: 4 Band Vertical HF Fixed Station covering 10,  15,
> 20, and 40
> Meters; 21'.
>
> Ron, K8HSY
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2