Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:59:24 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Re Pro vs. Home versions of JAWS
When I asked FS this same question, I was told that the Home version would
work only with 32 bit processors, while the Pro version will work with
either 32 or 64 bit processors. Thus, if you have a 64 bit processor, you
have no choice.
Ron, K8HSY
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Gary Tillinghast
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 1:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OTQ follow up
Hi Ed,
The saleperson that I talked to at FS said that there wasn't much of a
difference with JAWS for the PRO version and the Home version. She said it
was compatability. So they can charge more? Gary KB2YAA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: OTQ follow up
> What advantage is the pro over the home version? There is about 80.00
> dollars difference in the s m a I think.
> Ed K7UC
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Gary Tillinghast" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 11:45 AM
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: OTQ follow up
>
>> Hi all, Last week I asked about useing JAWS with Ultimate 64 bit as a
>> OS under Windows 7. The Ultimate 64 bit is listed as a upgrade with
>> the PRO version. The cost to upgrade JAWS would have been about $400
>> (200 for the JAWS upgrade and $200 for the SMA). I couldn't justify
>> the cost, so we are downgrading the OS to Windows 7 Home Platinun
>> version. One doesn't get many breaks with the FS group. So I hope
>> the information can help anyone in the future. Gary KB2YAA
|
|
|