I would read qst, but the iPhone app is not accessible, and I am not a member of Bard.
On Jul 15, 2013, at 4:46 PM, COLLEEN ROTH <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hello,
> I haven't read much of QST lately. The only I have read in the past ten years is the Public Service Info and Descriptions of Emergency Communications Events.
> I never read the Technical Articles. I also do not read anything about building something.
> I do read things about accessible radios though.
> Colleen, N8TNV;
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
> ,to3 [log in to unmask]
> Date: Monday, July 15, 2013 1:36 pm
> Subject: Re: qst
> 
>> 
>> 
>> hamfest calendar IS read, and some of the contests have been read, =
>> although in the pas thy the time they did so the contests were over, tha =
>> tight be better now that the lag time is  much less. i hav enot found =
>> any actual articles that are not read. the only things omitted are =
>> advertisements and contest stuff that would deb irrelevant due to lag =
>> time. why bother to read about a contest that happened 3 weeks ago?
>> I believe els does an exceptional job of reading qst and the other =
>> magazines I listen to. I refuse to cal that reading though :were you read =
>> with your eyes or with your fingers not with your ears unless it is on a =
>> radio :were
>> On Jul 15, 2013, at 12:01 PM, COLLEEN ROTH <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> Handihams just gives a synopsis of some of the articles.
>>> Bard reads some of the articles but doesn't read Advertisements =
>> because it is against Federal Law to do so.
>>> Bard also does not read some of the standings for contests.
>>> I do not believe that Hamfest Schedule is read either.
>>> The problem with QST in Digital format is that the platform used to =
>> produce it is not accessible with screenreaders.
>>> Colleen Roth, N8TNV;
>>> for20
>>> for20
>>> for20
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Richard Fiorello <[log in to unmask]>
> @> @> 1to#c [log in to unmask]
>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2013 10:05 am
>>> Subject: qst
>>> for20
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> Hi;
>>>> A couple trivia questions.  Firstly, I occasionally read qst =
>> primarily=20
>>>> from nls because it is simple to move around using daisy.  Although =
>> x=20
>>>> is on nls and handihams reads it, nls  leaves adds and other items =
>> t=20
>>>> are probably of more interest than the articles out.  I wonder if the=20=
>> 
>>>> digital version is 100% the same as the printed version or do they =
>> too=20
>>>> omit some things?  Finally although I haven't investigated, since =
>> th=20
>>>> magazine is on line courtesy of arrl what is the hang up with=20
>>>> downloading and reading?  Do they use scanned images, to many =
>> graphics=20
>>>> or where do we run into a problem?  It seems more than a bit =
>> repetitive=20
>>>> to have three organizations trying to produce some form of an =
>> accessible=20
>>>> magazine.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> =20
>>>> =97=20
>>>> richard