Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:55:29 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
07:13 2-3-2014, Mulaik, Stanley A:
>Lo que tu dice, Ruud, es ver. Mais per comprar le valores
>del bancas in moneta sin debito, le debito del governamento
>al banca pro le moneta pro expendituras deficitari obtenite
>con le valores es ora sin debito al bancas. Il es como si
>le tresoreria habeva create le moneta deficitari de nihil.
No, impossibile. Relege mi articulos e MMM.
>Le moneta al instantia de creation es sin debito, mais
>quando illo es in le reservas del bancas illo es usate
>in oppoio del creation de debitos in prestationes.
Isto anque. But when the central bank buys the bond etc., it pays
and therefore the payee (or its bank) obtains a claim to that
central bank, hence there is a debt on the part of the central
bank. Money is claim, and per Luca Pacioli that always also
involves a debt. Simple bookkeeping. No smart monetary theory can
reason that away.
--
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com
Ressources sur interlingua: http://rudhar.com/lingtics/intrlnga.htm
--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html
|
|
|