Isn't that a redundancy Jim?
pat, K9JAUAt 01:32 AM 5/31/2013, you wrote:
>Just remember that you cain't legislate against stupidity,
>especially when 99 percent of the legislators our um, STUPID! Jim
>WA6EKS
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>From: Howard Kaufman <[log in to unmask]
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Date sent: Fri, 31 May 2013 01:10:49 -0500
>Subject: Re: blindness sucks and more
>
>As a part of immigration reform change that part of the law.  One
>of the
>things that   many people against the wave of Spanish speakers
>immigrating
>here, is the prevalence of Spanish.
>
>Learn the f-ing language!!!  We would expect to learn your
>language if we
>went to live in your country.  I think the English as the
>official language
>of the United States, hopefully will be one of the compromise
>points in
>passable immigration reform.  Politics is a game of give and
>take.
>
>I know their are millions more of them than us, but with modern
>cable, most
>channels appear on multiple channels in different format.  One of
>them could
>carry DVS.  Their is no reason a station has to be limited to one
>signal,
>don't they carry multiple channels often over the air?
>
>The point is, if you couldn't run your business with out being
>accessible, a
>way would be rapidly found and agreed upon.
>But what's the profit in that?
>
>Remember, we are talking about a country, where politicians
>fought against
>laws to prevent child labor, and car manufacturers fought against
>the
>installation of seatbelts.