Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:42:16 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kind of sad, isn't it?
There is so much information on that web site, but it seems to be getting
increasingly difficult for us to use.
Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Gammon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: QRZ.com N A3ESSI#
> Hi Tom, yah, I have given up on qrz.com here. Haven't yet tried
> the other site you mentioned. I used to be able to use QRZ on my
> computer and also on a BrailleNote, but can no longer do that.
> 73, Jim WA6EKS
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:57:47 -0400
> Subject: QRZ.com
>
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I was just looking up a call on qrz.com, and was dismayed to find
> the search
> function and resultant information for a given call is less
> accessible than
> it has ever been.
>
> It does not seem as easy to get to the QRZ look-up as it once
> was, and even
> when there, it is more difficult to access different pieces of
> information
> for a given call sign.
>
> I know that wm7d has been suggested as another alternative, and
> may now
> start using that web site exclusively for call sign lookups.
>
> Has anyone had similar recent experience with qrz.com??
>
> I am using Jaws 13 and Windows XP on this particular computer.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
|
|
|