Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:47:33 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In my situation the vertical is great for DX, reason being, I have no trees,
there is a wire between 3 poles, only about 18 feet high at the center nice
for NVIS work, NTS nets and what not but when it comes to DX the vertical
beats it. The vertical is nice because where I'm in a trailer, I can run
radials under the house, tie it in to the skirting and I don't find it much
noisier if at all on some bands than the wire. For DX, it does play very
well. About the only thing I can't do is get in with the locals on 160, and
10 meters but I may fix the 10 meter thing down the road.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: Short trapped verticals VS 33/43 Unon traples verticals
> Which ever you like. Non-trap antennas are broader in band width. The
> real
> secret is the 32 radials.
> If you have room for that, why not put up an inverted Vee and save lots of
> money?
|
|
|