Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:34:35 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<E3.FE.03320.64954205@louvi-msg> |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I will give it a good look today. I've had this call 49 years this
month so it is with reluctance, though I like the idea of the new
call with an old sound which every ham when heard would recognize. thank you!
W B 6 H E F
:)
At 07:43 PM 8/9/2012, you wrote:
>Curtis,
>
>I like the following site to look to see what is available and to see what's
>coming-up soon.
>
>Also there is a lot of good information about the whole call sign thing.
>
>http://www.radioqth.net/
>
>
>Hope this is helpful.
>
>73
>
>Howard #3
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Curtis Delzer" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:44 PM
>Subject: Re: vanity call sign.
>
>
> > Hi, and thanks a big bunch.
> >
> >
> > At 11:34 AM 8/9/2012, you wrote:
> >
> >>Let me ask you, how do you know the call is available? Just because it is
> >>not assigned does not mean it is yet available. The call may be in the
> >>2-year grace period.
> >
> > I checked on the Hamdata Callsign Server which has an updated
> > call-sign list, and both of my references were not assigned.
> > that web site you mentioned about calls becoming available, etc. I'd
> > be interested in.
> >
> >
> >>Do you have the id number required in order to do business on the FCC
> >>website?
> >
> > Yes, I do, I renewed in 2010 on their web site.
> > thank you Howard!
|
|
|