Den 2015-11-28 kl. 11:28, skrev
Ruud Harmsen:
> 19:14 27-11-2015, Paul Bartlett:
>> [...] Vide mi essayo
>> (anglesemente) "Thoughts on IAL
>> SUccess"
>> http://www.panix.com/~bartlett/thoughts.html
>> . Iste re es plus
>> importantissime que le theorias
>> original de Gode e le IALA.
>
> "and endless tinkering to strive
> ever closer to a supposed
> "perfection" may actually impede
> use of any conIAL."
>
> Very true. Multo ver.
>
> (Mi interlingua pro le citation
> in anglese:
> Sin fin rectificar e readjustar
> un lingua, per attinger un
> perfection supposticie, pote de
> facto impedir le uso de ulle
> lingua auxiliar constructe.)
>
> «Would-be learners and users
> always find the ground shifting
> under their feet with a language
> subject to endless tinkering and
> supposed "improvements." »
>
> Right.
>
> (But admittedly, most of what I
> write in Interlingua myself, is
> ABOUT Interlingua, or other
> languages.)
>
Isto non es tanto estranie. Secundo
linguistas il occurre plus de
deliberationes pri le linguage in
gruppos ubi il non ha native
parolatores. In un gruppo ubi omnes
es native parlatores il ha multo
poc deliberationes consernente le
lingua ipse.
Kjell R
--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html