BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:51:28 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: radio
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<C778411CB70343F1A5D5576A8E811168@owner454d9914d>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
Yup, Howard, I agree.

The Super III. is nowhere as good as the Super II.

I have one, but just use it in my office for local AM/FM reception on 
occasion.

Very disappointed in the Super III. also.

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 11:37 AM
Subject: radio


>I bought the RCA Version of the Super Radio III and returned it in a week.
> Absolutely horrible.  Looked like a GE, felt like a GE, worked like crap.
> H T Kaufman MSW LCSW
> Adaptive Technology Instructor
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2