BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Jun 2013 10:26:31 +0100
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
<26A213B884FA4676B5122E1945B6C5D6@userfd892463d4>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
From:
David W Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To:
<D1.69.10307.2A7F2B15@louvi-msg>
Organization:
personal account
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (150 lines)
Surely it is like using a mouse rather than keyboard shortcuts.  Mousing is
much less efficient!


ATB

David W Wood 

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Scott Howell
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 10:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Touch screens

I would point out that even for a sighted operator, a touch screen would =
introduce some efficiency issues as well. I know ops who will log with =
one hand while making adjustments to the rig with another. I believe it =
would be possible to combine touch screen technology with some knobs and =
buttons. I cannot imagine anyone wanting a radio that has only a touch =
screen. This might satisfy some, but I think that segment would be much =
smaller than the overall population.

On Jun 8, 2013, at 4:46 AM, Kelvin Marsh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Colleen and All,
>=20
> If the accessibility has been implemented properly, touch screen =
technology
> can be easily used, and in the case of the Smartphone, can lead to the =
use
> of apps that would never be found with a traditional device.  On this =
basis
> I wouldn't dismiss it out of hand.
>=20
> Saying all that, there is a problem with touch screen technology that =
I've
> not heard mentioned anywhere.  Basically, you need to be listening =
fully to
> know what you are doing.  On a device with voice feedback and =
traditional
> buttons, you can probably get most things done with only cursory =
attention
> to the voice, because you remember the sequence of physical operation.
> Using a touch screen needs you to be listening to the feedback =
completely at
> every stage.
>=20
> On a radio, this is not a useful function.  Ideally you will want to =
make
> adjustments without any chatter that might distract you from the =
signal.  I
> touch on this scenario in my review of the Kenwood TS-590, when =
pressing the
> button to hear the sub VFO.  The frequency is announced by the voice =
every
> time you press and release the button.  Fortunately, you can turn off =
the
> automatic chatter, and it can be seen that Kenwood have given this =
some
> careful thought.  Too much talk is as bad as not enough! =20
>=20
> Turning a silent physical control to adjust say Noise Reduction is =
likely to
> be much more  comfortable for a blind operator, than  one being forced =
to
> use a chattering touch screen.  It is for this same reason I prefer =
not to
> use software to control a radio in real time.  The only audio I =
ideally want
> to hear is the incoming signal, anything else can be  a distraction =
<big
> smile>!=20
>=20
> Best wishes, Kelvin Marsh - M0AID
>=20
> Working to improve accessibility for radio amateurs with disabilities
>=20
> www.active-elements.org
>=20
> For accessibility evaluations of amateur equipment and MP3 manuals
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators =
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of COLLEEN ROTH
> Sent: 07 June 2013 23:01
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Touch screens
>=20
> Hi,
> Amen to the button and knobs. That is precisely why I do not have a =
phone
> with a Touchscreen.
> Colleen Roth
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
> ,to3 [log in to unmask]
> Date: Friday, June 7, 2013 2:41 pm
> Subject: Re: Touch screens
>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> I believe there is a radio out or coming out with a touch screen. I =
forget
>=20
>> who makes it but I heard about it the other day. I'm sure I'd be fine =
with
> a=20
>> touch screen, I have a couple things with the flat key pad like most=20=

>> microwaves have and I do fine with them but am not comfortable with =
them,=20
>> don't like them and will do my best to avoid them and touch screens =
where=20
>> and when ever possible. I'm just not comfortable with them I'd rather =
have
>=20
>> the buttons right there in front of me to push.
>> ----- Original Message -----=20
>> From: "Dustin" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 2:00 PM
>> Subject: Touch screens
>>=20
>>=20
>>> Do you guys ever think that ham radios will go to touch screens? Or
> maybe=20
>>> th=3D
>>> ere is already some radios with a touch screen. I wonder what it =
would
> be=20
>>> li=3D
>>> ke to use a radio running iOS. LOL like that would ever happen
>>>=20
>>> Sent from my iPhone=3D
>>>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3199/6392 - Release Date: =
06/07/13

ATOM RSS1 RSS2