o.k., then change the subject. Bring up something radio related. Good
grief people!!!!!! I hate list cops!!!!!
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.
On Thu, 30 May 2013, brady
wrote:
> I agree! Come on, lets get back to the point of the list!!!
>
>
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Angelo Sonnesso <[log in to unmask]
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Date sent: Thu, 30 May 2013 18:55:27 -0400
>> Subject: Re: sighted wife
>
>> Boy, talk about getting off subject.
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]
>> To: <[log in to unmask]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:57 PM
>> Subject: Re: sighted wife
>
>
>>> Ya never know about people, Butch. Maybe it is as you say, that
> he was =
>>> over the top with the independence thing and felt he had
> something to =
>>> prove to someone, even if someone was just himself. Maybe He
> didn't want =
>>> his wife to feel as though she was just a pair of eyeballs
> (though I =
>>> can't fathom this in a social situation such as this). Maybe
> *she* =
>>> wanted it that way and didn't want to do the sighted guide
> thing. Or =
>>> maybe she was a rotten sighted guide, and he found it easier to
> not rely =
>>> on her as a guide. (I've had some pretty horrible guides in my
> life, so, =
>>> yeah, could be.)=20
>>> --
>>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
>>> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
>
>
>
>>> On May 30, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Butch Bussen
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>>> I'm much like you Jerry. Rest rooms are a pain in the ass, well
> I=20
>>>> guesws they would be <smile>, but I mean as far as getting
> around. =
>>> I've=20
>>>> had to ask for help at times. My wife and I did almost
> everything=20
>>>> together except ham radio stuff as she wasn't interested. Even
> if =
>>> other=20
>>>> people were there, she insisted she be my guide which was fine
> with =
>>> me.=20
>>>> I had a friend in Vegas who we'd go out with some times, and he
> was=20
>>>> blind, his wife was sighted. He would insist on using his cane
> and=20
>>>> following her through the casinos which I thought was a little
> over=20
>>>> board as far as stressing independence. I just grabbed my
> wife's =
>>> elbow=20
>>>> and away we went, and we made much better time.
>>>> 73
>>>> Butch
>>>> WA0VJR
>>>> Node 3148
>>>> Wallace, ks.
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> On Thu, 30 May 2013, Gery=20
>>>> Gaubert wrote:
>>>> =20
>>>>> Well I am ok with the fact that my mother in law and father in
> law =
>>> let thei=3D
>>>>> r concerns be known. I always did get along with them and we
> joke =
>>> about se=3D
>>>>> eing and not. I have a son the is 23 now but due to financial
> issues =
>>> my wi=3D
>>>>> fe was working when my son was born. I raised him and he is ok.
> I =
>>> guess i=3D
>>>>> f the person I fell in love with were blind it would have worked
> out =
>>> too.
>>>>> Since we are open and honest, I must say that many of you
> seem =
>>> more in=3D
>>>>> dependent than I am. I don't go many places alone and a big
> issue is =
>>> when =3D
>>>>> I go some where with my wife, the issue of getting around in the
> =
>>> men's room=3D
>>>>> bothers me. It is really embarrassing to have to ask for help
> but =
>>> you hav=3D
>>>>> e to go. Curious on how others handle this situation. I am
> totally =
>>> blind =3D
>>>>> and have to artificial eyes so no light or shadow perception.
> In =
>>> spite of =3D
>>>>> my lack of independence, I am assistant director of the county =
>>> sheriff's of=3D
>>>>> fice IT division.
>>>>> =20
>>>>> Gery D. Gaubert
>>>>> Assistant, Information Technology Administrator
>>>>> St. Charles Parish Sheriff's Office
>>>>> office (985) 783-0208
>>>>> mobile 504-329-9439
>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>> =20
>>>>> =20
>>>>> =20
>>>>> This e-mail and any attachments thereto are intended only for
> the use =
>>> by th=3D
>>>>> e addressee(s) named herein and contain propriety/confidential =
>>> information.=3D
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are
> hereby =
>>> notif=3D
>>>>> ied that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
> e-mail, =
>>> and an=3D
>>>>> y attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received =
>>> this e-=3D
>>>>> mail in error, please immediately notify me by telephone =
>>> (985-783-0208) and=3D
>>>>> permanently delete/destroy the original and any copy of any
> e-mail =
>>> and any=3D
>>>>> printout thereof.
>>>>> =20
>>>>> =20
>
>
|
