BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Wed, 15 May 2013 14:12:25 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: iCom microphone pin layout?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<BCA37994B55449C5BCFF561F5D899A3C@newdell>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Steve <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
Different response curves.  One head hardly has any baffles on the side, the 
other one does.  Depending which head you have on the mike, there are 
differences in the frequency response curves.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rick" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: iCom microphone pin layout?


> What's the reason for 2 heads?
> I thought about buying the MC-90, but got the MC-60 instead.
>
> 7 3.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2