 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2013 12:02:53 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<3D471BB942BA49CAA1AB11B88D8A3E98@JohnMPC> |
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
<32.A1.10307.608A3915@louvi-msg> |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Usually, one's good for DX, very narrow and hard to listen to for a long
time, and one's a little more full and easier to listen to for rag chewing.
The MC-60, if stock, is good for rag chewing. I say if stock because I know
a lot of people who've put hail mic elements in them like the HC5 or that
god awful 4. I say it's that bad because it hurts to listen to for me but
gets you heard in a pile up. I'd never do that to anyone though. I have an
MC-50 in the closet that's got an HC5 element in it if I want it and my
MC-60A is completely stock.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: iCom microphone pin layout?
> What's the reason for 2 heads?
> I thought about buying the MC-90, but got the MC-60 instead.
>
> 7 3.
|
|
|
