Ed, Yes I agree and it is built like a tank.  Also, if on the wrong antenna
or high SWR it starts beeping like crazy.  I have used them since they
first came on the market.  RF Applications was coming out with a newer one
but the guy doing the work passed away and they decided not to market it.
I called them and was told this.  This was some time ago though.  Lots of
interesting info on the blind-hams list right now.

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Ed Malmgren
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 9:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Audible s w r/p w r meter

Fred, I feel the same way with C W being the readout, It is much easier for
me to understand with all the external noises kicking around the shack.  73
Ed   K7UC

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Fred Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 6:05 PM
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Audible s w r/p w r meter

> To me, the P200 is more simple and stable.  Also, very dependable.  A 
> technician checked out the P2000 for me with a Byrd watt meter and 
> told me that he didn't think I could find a better one for me.  I have 
> tried the
> TW1 several time but I just do not like it.  If I had never used the 
> P2000 and used the TW1 from the start I am sure I would like it much 
> better.  If a new one comes out and I can afford it, I'll give it a 
> try.  One reason I like the p2000 might be because I like hearing
everything read out in CW.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Dave Marthouse
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 7:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Audible s w r/p w r meter
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> Just out of curiosity why don't you like the TW1?
>
>
>
> Dave Marthouse N2AAM
> [log in to unmask]
>
>