BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:38:11 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: I am back
From:
Curtis Delzer <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<F0.C3.19828.A064A415@louvi-msg>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines) 
that is about what it should be considering the vaggeries of PEP, etc.
At 04:27 PM 03/20/13, you wrote:
>I get 73 to 95 out on the other bands, comparing it with an omni D for
>refference power.
>Probably the meter is accureate in the same ways with different transmitters
>pushing it.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2