BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:24:33 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Michael Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
<6D.F6.03304.4C963905@louvi-msg>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
 this message is also nothing but political posturing
On Nov 2, 2012, at 2:35 AM, Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Now I do take offense to folks getting political here.  You wanna 
> cause more  off topic stuff, then just keep up this kind of crap.  
> This country needs to be brought together, like really united, 
> not further divided! And this applies across the board, 
> conservative or liberal.  Just too much extreme polarity here.  I 
> guess we would become really like minded if we really did find 
> ourselves in a War of the Worlds! That would do the trick.  In a 
> way, we are already there with too many of us populating the 
> planet and drowning in our own pollusion and failing to pay 
> attention to that.  Ok, enough already, Jim WA6EKS.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gary Tillinghast <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:21:49 -0400
> Subject: Re: Signing off...again
> 
> ssounds like a Obama liberal, if they can't have it their way 
> they take
> their sand pail and go home.  Hy HY Y
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert C" <[log in to unmask]
> To: <[log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:16 PM
> Subject: Signing off...again
> 
> 
> Well, I am once again leaving the list for the vast majority of 
> the
> posts are off topic.  If people are comfortable with this, so be 
> it.  But
> its a damn shame for there are some of you who have a lot to 
> offer when
> it comes to ham radio (the name of the list is BLIND HAMS but 
> maybe its
> time to go with the flow and change it to something else).  So 
> rather
> than press the delete key with no end in sight, I shall just bail 
> out.
> As a ham radio op, its pointless to be on this list.
> 
> Quote of the nanosecond . . .
> Oxymoron: Entertaining sermon
> Robert & Dreamer Doll  ke7nwn
> E-mail-
> [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2