Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:28:09 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<009c01cd9900$c7c48fd0$8501a8c0@Aimee> |
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<91.B0.03320.1A19D505@louvi-msg> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Actually I think it was the other way around. I played around with both
sites before the merger too, and I found the Serius site to be a little more
workable.
73
Aimee Lewis
KK4JHF
"Be well, do good work and keep in touch." (Garrison Keillor)
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 6:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OT Sirius-XM question
Yeah, that's what I remember, I haven't checked after the merger and I don't
even think I've been to the web site more than once since then so it
probably has changed. As I recall, serius always had a major issue with
accessibility on their site and XM didn't.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: OT Sirius-XM question
>A lot of things are different since the merger of Sirius and XM. At one
> time on the XM service you could click the link for the channel you wanted
> to listen to and that was it.
> Harvey
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 9:59 PM
> Subject: Re: OT Sirius-XM question
>
>
>> Their online player used to be accessible when they offered it free a few
>> years ago but since they went back to the pay system, I haven't tried it
>> and
>> that's been a while. It was nice when it was free though, I had no
>> problem
>> with it, or very little.
|
|
|