Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:46:12 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
quite so. Although you can use an external balun and feed the internal
tuner with coax. The newer internal auto tuners are much better. Elecraft
claims the tuner in the K3 will match anything up to 10 to 1. I've never
taken precise measurements but my personal experience would seem to support
this. Then there's the convenience factor. It's nice to be able to hit a
button and be ready to go in seconds. I have both internal and external
options available and I haven't had a need to use the external manual tuner
which is a dentron super tuner in years. This is with a G5Rv which seems to
fall well within the K3 tuner's range.
Lou Kolb
Voice-over Artist:
Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
Messages On-hold:
www.loukolb.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard, W A 9 Y B W" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: External tuner vs internal tuner?
> Tim,
>
> Someone can correct me if I am wrong but I think the external tuners can
> often tune a wider range of S W R than an internal tuner.
>
> Also, you can only connect a coax fed antenna to the radio containing an
> internal tuner.
>
> External tuners can connect to antennas with several types of feed lines.
>
> External tuners can also be tweaked manually to get a closer match for
> those
> of us who are obsessed with the numbers!
>
> 73
>
> Howard #3
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Gammon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:10 PM
> Subject: External tuner vs internal tuner?
>
>
>> Steve, what advantage is there to using an external auto tuner
>> over the internal tuner in the TS-480? I have the 100 w model and
>> really think it's a great rig. That question about the tuner has
>> nagged at me though. I have been wondering if it would be
>> worthwhile to get something like an MFJ external tuner, or is
>> that simply redundant because of the existing internal one. I
>> have occasionally used the rig running low power when I had
>> terrible SWR and still worked stations. Jim WA6EKS
|
|
|