Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:34:42 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This might sound horrible to think, but does anyone think that having that
sterilization, which makes sure that the girls can't get pregnant, might
make them more susceptible to being abused? I mean...if A abuses B sexually,
then at some point it'll be obvious with the pregnancy scare. But if A
knows that B has been sterilized, then A might say who cares, it's not like
B can get pregnant, and might do it more? I don't know. I worry about a lot
of things, but this issue has been flipping back and forth in my head for
years. What do you all think?
p.s. please tell me if this is out of line. If it is please accept my
heartfelt apologies.
~Harleen
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:15 PM, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I am all for that being done... the article said no boys every have that
> done....
> well boys can't get pregnant by some care giver while in a long term care
> place.
>
> We all care for our kids as long as we can... but when we get old or the
> kids get bigger than us and can hurts us we
> all will one day have to look to services....even if it is when we die.....
> So I can understand....the child will never know what it is to 'miss' her
> period but she would mostlikely be scared by
> a pregancy.
>
> I know I DO NOT miss my period....I am a normal female and hated it. What
> a mess and a pain.
>
> Kris
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------
>
> To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
>
> http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
>
-----------------------
To change your mail settings or leave the C-PALSY list, go here:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?SUBED1=c-palsy
|
|
|