Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 8 Aug 2012 20:14:45 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
And my reply makes #10 for a topic that was a total waste of everyone's
time and cluttered up the list. It never fails! A request to cut down on
traffic generates even more. LOL And that is all I have to say on this.
Quote of the nanosecond...
In the beginning, the Lord created chocolate, and he saw that it was
good. Then he separated the light from the dark, and it was better.
Robert & Dreamer Doll ke7nwn
E-mail-
[log in to unmask]
Home Page-
http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/
On 8/8/2012 6:12 PM, Barbara Lombardi wrote:
> Agree. But just to say thanks for someone's idea would be better served
> going to that person. Oh well, just my thoughts.
>
>
> Barb K1EIR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Howard, W A 9 Y B W
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:12 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: list traffic
>
> Hi Barb,
>
> While I understand that your suggestion would cut down a little on traffic,
> I feel it is worthwhile to know that someone's problem was solved or their
> question was answered satisfactorily. If the list doesn't know that an
> issue has been solved then, people will continue to post to the list on an
> issue that has been resolved. That generates unnecessary traffic also.
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> 73
>
> Howard #3
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barbara Lombardi" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 2:14 PM
> Subject: list traffic
>
>
>> Please, if you are going to thank someone for their help, then please
>> write
>> them off list. 73, Barb k1eir
>>
>> Barb K1EIR
>>
>
>
|
|
|