BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Vanity call sign fee
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 May 2012 21:47:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
No extra work, just another way for the government  to squeeze another bit 
of money out of people.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John J. Jacques" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: Vanity call sign fee


> Hi all, thanks Lou, for the bulletin.  I don't mind paying for a vanity
> callsign originally, but I don't understand why one should have to pay to
> renew it, when it should be renewable, just as any callsign is, so whare
> is the extra work?
>
> 73:
> John
>
> John Jacques
> Amateur Radio Station: KD8PC
> "Where Cat Is,  Is Civilization!"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2