Since there has been so much discussion on this, if anyone cited the 
specific parts of the rules, I missed it. I would like this please. And 
lets wait until Tom gets a response from the FCC so we can settle this 
and move on.

Quote of the nanosecond...
Dilbert's Words of Wisdom: Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how 
to get along without it.
Robert & Dreamer Doll  ke7nwn
E-mail-
[log in to unmask]
Home Page-
http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/

On 8/10/2012 10:57 PM, Tom Brennan wrote:
> Again, a narrow focus.  I have sent a request to the FCC on this issue and will
> post what I get.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Michael Thurman wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 01:48:12 -0400
>> From: Michael Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
>> Reply-To: For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Third party rules.
>>
>> again read the rules it says nothing of the kind in part 97 =20
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Tom Brennan <[log in to unmask]> =
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Rick, you have to be the one operating the transmitter and controlling =
>> the
>>> station.  You have to give your station call etc. because it is your =
>> station and
>>> your wife cannot operate under that call.  You have to be physically =
>> present
>>> when she is operating.
>>> =20
>>> Tom
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
>>> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>>
>