I agree,

I like the personal responses, it shows that my opinion or suggestion is 
appreciated even though it may not be the one that solved the problem.

73

Howard #3
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: list traffic


> perhaps, but more often than not, additional information is offered in
> subsequent thank you messages, and the entire issue or problem is usually
> sorted out and fleshed out properly...I don't see a problem with it since
> this list is pretty low traffic anyway.
> It's not like there are hundreds of non-sence messages a day passing 
> through
> like allot of other lists I've had the misfortune of subscribing to for
> brief periods.
> It's a discussion list, and part of discussion is thanking people for 
> their
> help, and responding to each person if that's what you wish to do.
> Tom chooses to respond to each message, and I'm fine with that.
> And I hope he doesn't change because it most often leads to deeper 
> analysis
> or figuring out of a particular situation.
>
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Barbara Lombardi" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 7:09 PM
> Subject: Re: list traffic
>
>
>> Because it clutters the list and contributes only to the person sending
>> the
>> message.
>>
>>
>> Barb K1EIR
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators 
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of colin McDonald
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:16 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: list traffic
>>
>> why?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Barbara Lombardi" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:14 PM
>> Subject: list traffic
>>
>>
>>> Please, if you are going to thank someone for their help, then please
>>> write
>>> them off list.  73, Barb k1eir
>>>
>>> Barb K1EIR
>>>