BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:03:59 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
so mixing shouldn't be an issue either then.
well, with the third harmonic being smack dab on the ham band, it would 
almost stand to reason that this might be the cause.
then again, with RFI of any kind, sometimes logic and reason don't play any 
sort of roll hi hi.

73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Brennan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: some discoveries re: reception on ht and echo link.


> Collin, band width iks supposed to be pretty narrow on implants.  I'd have 
> to
> download a table of American manufacturers to see exactly how wide but 
> they do
> try and keep them narrow.  Think is that there shouldn't be an extreme 
> amount of
> bleed from the units.  Also, you have some potential interaction with the 
> return
> signals from the implanted coils which, in the units we're discussing, is 
> about
> 106.6 or 106.7 mHz.
>
> Tom
>
>
> Tom Brennan  KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2