oops i mean to say the full size would have been more readable than the wallet one   if you faxed the wallet sie i can see why a fax machine woul dnot have captured it properly  bigger is better when it comes to somethinglike that.   good luck

On Jun 26, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Michael Thurman wrote:

> the full size one would be much easier for them to read  the wallet one =
> if you faxed it would have also been more readable
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:46 AM, Harry Brown wrote:
> 
>> Hi Ron,
>> Nope, I didn't. I'm just waiting to see which modem I've got.
>> Sounds like Howard knows what kind of modem I've got.
>> Once I find out the modem I have, then I'll go to the firewall =
> solutions =3D
>> page, and hopefully, get the step by step way to forward those UDP =3D
>> ports.
>> And Bob,
>> I'll be here, and looking forward to your call!
>> And Mike,
>> Yeah, you mentioned a photo copy.
>> Now folks, I'm not a copy expert here.
>> When I want something done, I just print the thing.
>> So, I know of Kinkos, and places like that.
>> So, here's my question. Do I have them photo copy the wallet size =3D
>> license, or, my paper license? And yes, I do know where the paper copy =
> =3D
>> is.
>> =46rom doing a definition search for photocopy, it says it is "a copy =
> of =3D
>> the actual print document", so, sounds like no laminated wallet size =3D=
> 
>> version will do, and thankfully, I know right where the print copy of =
> my =3D
>> license is!
>> Trippy, ac8s