BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 May 2012 12:44:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (117 lines)
I'm not saying definitely go through with it but sometimes these people hear 
it mentioned that you're thinking of it and it makes them suddenly wake up 
and get things done like they should have in the first place. Not always, 
but I've seen it happen more often than not.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: looking for a 10-80M trapped dipole


> Not worth it, I suspect.  He is in Michigan, the guy is in New York. 
> Can't
> enforce a small claims case and it's not worth going to federal court. 
> But,
> I'd be sure to post a negatory review on any ham-related site you can.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: John Miller
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 7:35 PM
> Subject: Re: looking for a 10-80M trapped dipole
>
>
> Threaten legal action, I hate doing that but in situations like that,
> sometimes there's no choice and just the threat gets results.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 5:48 PM
> Subject: Re: looking for a 10-80M trapped dipole
>
>
>>    Yeah, it was under what he called the "lifetime warranty, no matter
>> what!".
>>
>> But, it's obviously worthless!
>>
>> I've gotten no satisfaction after repeated phone calls, e-mails, and even
>> a
>> registered letter.  This has been going on for almost a year now.
>>
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 4:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: looking for a 10-80M trapped dipole
>>
>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>> I feel sorry for you, for sure!
>>> Was it still under warranty? I hope so.
>>> Trippy, ac8s
>>>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>>>  From: Tom Behler=20
>>>  To: [log in to unmask]
>>>  Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 6:49 AM
>>>  Subject: Re: looking for a 10-80M trapped dipole
>>>
>>>
>>>      Colin and all:
>>>
>>>  I'd sure like one of these myself?
>>>
>>>  Might fit my RV situation too, since I have still not heard anything =
>>> from=20
>>>  N2VZ Enterprises about the broken Turbo-tuner I sent to him almost a =
>>> year=20
>>>  ago.  You may recall that I used that Turbo-tuner to tune the =
>>> screw-driver=20
>>>  antenna that currently is on the back of the RV, and without it, =
>>> though it=20
>>>  can be done manually, tuning especially on the lower bands, is quite =
>>> tricky.
>>>
>>>  73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>
>>>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>>>  From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>  To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>  Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 1:56 AM
>>>  Subject: looking for a 10-80M trapped dipole
>>>
>>>
>>>  >a friend is looking for a 10 to 80M trapped dipole requiring little =
>>> or no
>>>  > tuner, that can be fairly easily deployed in the field.
>>>  > He's already got a tripple hussler arrangement on the RV, and an =
>>> Icom long
>>>  > wire tuner.
>>>  > However, he now has a 40FT telescoping linemans poll stuck to the =
>>> back of
>>>  > the RV that can be raised up to support the center of a bigger HF =
>>> dipole.
>>>  > He doesn't really want to go the G5RV route due to the necesity of =
>>> the
>>>  > latter line hanging down...he wants flexibility for various =
>>> anchoring
>>>  > arrangements and easy deployment.
>>>  > Does anyone have any recommendations for a good 10M to 80M dipole =
>>> that=20
>>>  > might
>>>  > fit these requirements?
>>>  > As I said, little to no tuning would be best.
>>>  > Though he does have a couple small LDG auto tuners that would make =
>>> life
>>>  > simpler if the antenna needed a bit of tuning on the various bands.
>>>  > Either a prebuilt antenna, or any recommendations as to where one =
>>> can
>>>  > perchase premade traps that can be used to build such a beast.
>>>  >
>>>  > 73
>>>  > Colin, V A6BKX
>>>  >
>>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2