Gerry,
You're doing all the right things and I, for one appreciate it. Keep
it up and let us know what and when to write.
Pat, K9JAUAt 08:01 PM 3/22/2012, you wrote:
>It is to bad that you don't read QST. There is a lot of good information in
>most all of the issues. Yes BARD gets them out a little late, but at least
>they are easy to navigate. And the only reason that I even got in contact
>with ARRL was because I thought they would be open to learning about our
>accessibility needs and wants. They did not know that we couldn't use Adobe
>Air. They were happy to know that we could use Adobe X, and when I didn't
>have all of the answers to the questions they were happy to take the names
>of people at GW Micro and Adobe to learn more about Accessibility. At this
>point the project is going well and I have found them to be very thankful
>that I wanted to have a nice and friendly education and discussion with
>them. The only reason I want to send a letter is to say that I know X
>amount of people that would be interested in using the ARRL for QST if they
>can see the way to make it useable to us. I am also trying to learn about
>work around in case it doesn't go well for us. I don't have any new
>information at this point, and I don't think I have much more to say about
>the subject. The only thing that I have to say right now is that If you
>don't even read the Magazine, and if you don't like ARRL then why does it
>get you so upset? Thanks everyone for reading my messages and I am sorry if
>I got anyone upset about this. Gerry WB6IVF who is thankful for ARRL and
>Handihams.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 2:14 PM
>Subject: Re: Man O Man
>
>
> > Hi there,
> > Well, I have my rights, and a right to my oppinion, and a right to be an =
> > activist.
> > I will never be silent.
> > Now as far as ARRL and qst, I'll be glad to sign a petition, or =
> > something, but I don't even read qst any more.
> > I'm also in agreement with Phil, the ARRL is a joke!
> > Trippy, ac8s
> > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > From: John Miller=20
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: Man O Man
> >
> >
> > You are the very reason it's that much harder for the rest of us, you =
> > and=20
> > those who think and act like you do. By the time someone wants to talk =
> >
> > rationally, one of you has already dug the hole so rather than =
> > starting from=20
> > ground level, the person who has the right approach and would be =
> > listened to=20
> > often has to dig out of a hole first and that's often harder than =
> > starting=20
> > from scratch because who ever you tried to talk to already had =
> > negative=20
> > thoughts they wouldn't have had if it wasn't for that ranting raving=20
> > lunatic.
> > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: Man O Man
> >
> >
> > > Hi Anthony,
> > > I won't do that.
> > > Trippy, ac8s
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----=3D20
> > > From: Anthony Vece=3D20
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:32 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Man O Man
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Trippy or is it Tricky;
> > >
> > > Why don't you just leave accessibility to diplomats.
> > >
> > > You are only going to gum up the works and make bad for the rest of =
> > =3D
> > > us.
> > >
> > > 73 de Anthony w2ajv
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my Verizon iPhone!
> > >
> > > On Mar 21, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]> =
> > =3D
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Butch,
> > > > I strongly agree with you on this one.
> > > > People build things with no thought to accessability, no thought =
> > at =3D
> > > all.
> > > > Trippy, ac8s
> > > > ----- Original Message -----=3D3D20
> > > > From: Butch Bussen=3D3D20
> > > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:44 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Man O Man
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (If this stuff was designed from the ground up with =
> > accessibility =3D
> > > in=3D3D20
> > > > mind, it could easily be done these days. Take for example the =
> > =3D3D
> > > > digital=3D3D20
> > > > boxes we all were buying when TV went digital. A talking chip =
> > =3D
> > > could=3D3D20
> > > > have easily and cheaply been added. The problem with much of =
> > this =3D
> > > =3D3D
> > > > stuff=3D3D20
> > > > is no one gives a damn or even thinks of accessibility. It =
> > really =3D
> > > has =3D3D
> > > >
> > > > nothing to do with entitlement. Look what Kenwood does with =3D
> > > their=3D3D20
> > > > radios.
> > > > 73
> > > > Butch
> > > > WA0VJR
> > > > Node 3148
> > > > Wallace, ks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Steve wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Yep, one of the byproducts of being such an entitlement society.
> > > >>
> > > >> Steve, K8SP
> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:31 AM
> > > >> Subject: Man O Man
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> I really appreciate getting the service from Bard, Q S T and =
> > such =3D
> > > =3D3D
> > > > and it is
> > > >>> always good trying for better but have you noticed, the more we =
> > =3D
> > > get =3D3D
> > > > the
> > > >>> more
> > > >>> we want untill we sometimes are a pain in you know what. 73
> > > >>> Ed K7UC
> > > >>
> > > >>
|