BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:37:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (55 lines)
Yo dude, how about showing a little class.  It's funny that despite your 
general third grade spelling, you always manage to get the profanity 
correct.

73, Steve KW3A

On 3/22/2012 11:54 PM, Michael Thurman wrote:
> i agree!!!!!!! noone gives a fuck abotu theblind
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Butch Bussen wrote:
>
>> (If this stuff was  designed from the ground up with accessibility in=20=
>
>> mind, it could easily be done these days.  Take for example the =
> digital=20
>> boxes we all were buying when TV went digital.  A talking chip could=20=
>
>> have easily and cheaply been added.  The problem with much of this =
> stuff=20
>> is no one gives a damn or even thinks of accessibility.  It really has=20=
>
>> nothing to do with entitlement.  Look what Kenwood does with their=20
>> radios.
>> 73
>> Butch
>> WA0VJR
>> Node 3148
>> Wallace, ks.
>> =20
>> =20
>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Steve wrote:
>> =20
>>> Yep, one of the byproducts of being such an entitlement society.
>>> =20
>>> Steve, K8SP
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Ed Malmgren"<[log in to unmask]>
>>> To:<[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:31 AM
>>> Subject: Man O Man
>>> =20
>>> =20
>>>> I really appreciate getting the service from Bard, Q S T and such =
> and it is
>>>> always good trying for better but have you noticed, the more we get =
> the
>>>> more
>>>> we want untill we sometimes are a pain in you know what.  73
>>>>    Ed   K7UC
>>> =20
>>> =20
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2