I still have the old 2AT that had the thumb wheels on top.  I have never had 
trouble with that radio and it still gets used a lot.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 6:07 AM
Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202


> radioshack was the brand but it was actually a rebranded icom IC-02AT for
> the most part.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:44 AM
> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>
>
>>I am wondering about the brand?
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "PATRICK GORMLEY" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:08 PM
>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>
>>
>>> Jerry an htx202 is a 2-meter handi talkie.  It just covers the two meter
>>> band and can't receive anything above the band such as noaa weather like
>>> the
>>> htx212 mobile rig can.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:29 PM
>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>
>>>
>>>> what is an HTX202?
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:43 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I had one of those as well and while it was an ok radio I preferred my
>>>>> Alinco dual banders over the htx202 they were more compatable with the
>>>>> lo=
>>>>> cal
>>>>> repeaters that were in the area I was living in at that time and fit 
>>>>> in
>>>>> t=
>>>>> he
>>>>> hand better as well =0D
>>>>> =0D
>>>>> =0D
>>>>> =0D
>>>>> =0D
>>>>> -------Original Message-------=0D
>>>>> =0D
>>>>> From: John Miller=0D
>>>>> Date: 2/1/2012 8:12:05 PM=0D
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>>>> =0D
>>>>> Personally I think the HTX-202 was much better in quality and sound. 
>>>>> It
>>>>> w=
>>>>> as=0D
>>>>> a little big, but I'd doubt if anything out of china will last as long
>>>>> as=
>>>>> =0D
>>>>> they did.=0D
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>>>>> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:41 PM=0D
>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>>>> =0D
>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> yeh, I guess if you like boat anchors, and antiquated technology
>>>>>> the=0D
>>>>>> htx202=0D
>>>>>> is great...i've got a 38 dollar chinese dual band handheld that will
>>>>>> pu=
>>>>> t=0D
>>>>>> it=0D
>>>>>> to shame though lol.=0D
>>>>>>=0D
>>>>>> 73=0D
>>>>>> Colin, V A6BS=0D
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>>>>>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:11 PM=0D
>>>>>> Subject: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>>>>>=0D
>>>>>>=0D
>>>>>>> Hi John,=0D
>>>>>>> Just trying to get caught up on blind-hams archives.=0D
>>>>>>> A year ago, you mentioned you had the htx 202, you still have it?=0D
>>>>>>> I doubt you do, because, well, what a great ht, and there is a high
>>>>>>> =3D=
>>>>> =0D
>>>>>>> demand for those!=0D
>>>>>>> I had one and loved it!=0D
>>>>>>> 73,=0D
>>>>>>> Trippy, ac8s
>>>>