BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:32:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
I had there 220 ht.
I didn't find anything exceptional about it.
However, under the battery compartment, their is a pot and, I had to use it to turn the audio down.
It was just entirely too hot.



Sent from my Verizon iPhone!

On Feb 2, 2012, at 8:18 AM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I've never had luck with alinco equipment personally, even at the RACES 
> station I volunteer at we've seen more than our fair share break.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:43 AM
> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
> 
> 
>> I had one of those as well and while it was an ok radio I preferred my
>> Alinco dual banders over the htx202 they were more compatable with the lo=
>> cal
>> repeaters that were in the area I was living in at that time and fit in t=
>> he
>> hand better as well =0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>> -------Original Message-------=0D
>> =0D
>> From: John Miller=0D
>> Date: 2/1/2012 8:12:05 PM=0D
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>> =0D
>> Personally I think the HTX-202 was much better in quality and sound. It w=
>> as=0D
>> a little big, but I'd doubt if anything out of china will last as long as=
>> =0D
>> they did.=0D
>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:41 PM=0D
>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>>> yeh, I guess if you like boat anchors, and antiquated technology the=0D
>>> htx202=0D
>>> is great...i've got a 38 dollar chinese dual band handheld that will pu=
>> t=0D
>>> it=0D
>>> to shame though lol.=0D
>>> =0D
>>> 73=0D
>>> Colin, V A6BS=0D
>>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:11 PM=0D
>>> Subject: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>> =0D
>>> =0D
>>>> Hi John,=0D
>>>> Just trying to get caught up on blind-hams archives.=0D
>>>> A year ago, you mentioned you had the htx 202, you still have it?=0D
>>>> I doubt you do, because, well, what a great ht, and there is a high =3D=
>> =0D
>>>> demand for those!=0D
>>>> I had one and loved it!=0D
>>>> 73,=0D
>>>> Trippy, ac8s 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2