Do you still have kit?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: general Receivers
>I had one of those.
>
> It really served me well during the Persian Gulf war.
>
> I listened to sw broadcasts from all over the world.
>
> I even use to bring it into work.
>
>
> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Gerry Leary
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 11:53 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>
> Soney does, and I have one. It's antenna is broken but the rest of it
> works
>
> fine. It is the size of a caset case.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:22 PM
> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>
>
>> Who makes the SW100S?
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dan B Dyer Jr,/Danny" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 23:08
>> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>>
>>
>>> the sync detect on the sw100S is pretty good, and although i've never
>>> played
>>> with a 2010, both the 7600G and GR's is pretty useable, although I think
>>> the
>>> 100S is my favorite, Sure would like to have one of those lil jewells,
>>> but
>>> not willing to pay what they're bringing on the used market, I've had a
>>> couple, three in fact, but let em all go unfortunately, but you guys
>>> know
>>> the drill, hi. dd.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:04 PM
>>> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>>>
>>>
>>>> Lou,
>>>>
>>>> The Eton E1 also has a very good synchronous detector which differs
>>>> from
>>>> those on other receivers in that you can select upper, lower, or both
>>>> sidebands. I've also heard that the Lowe HF-150, a British receiver
>>>> from
>>>> the 1980s, has an excellent sync detector, but I've never actually
>>>> tried
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 20:12
>>>> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The sync detect on the 2010 was about the best I've ever seen. The
>>>>> one
>>>>> on
>>>>> the 7600 wasn't bad either. Lou
>>>>> Lou kolb
>>>>> Voice-over Artist:
>>>>> Radio/TV Adds, Video narrations
>>>>> Messages On-hold:
>>>>> www.loukolb.com
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 7:12 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Steve;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't know that either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>>> On Behalf Of Steve Dresser
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 12:01 PM
>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Butch,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Synchronous detection is a method of compensating for the effects of
>>>>>> selective fading, which is caused by the disappearance of the carrier
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> AM signal. A signal locked to the received carrier frequency is fed
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> radio's detector so that when the real carrier disappears, the
>>>>>> detector
>>>>>> remains happy. The result is a lack of the distortion typically
>>>>>> heard
>>>>>> when
>>>>>> a station starts to fade out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 11:45
>>>>>> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I know we discussed this before, but I have severe c r s, what is
>>>>>>> synchronous detection?
>>>>>>> 73
>>>>>>> Butch
>>>>>>> WA0VJR
>>>>>>> Node 3148
>>>>>>> Wallace, ks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Bob, K8LR wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I never owned a Sony 2010, but synchronous detection does help a
>>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> weak signals.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bob, K8LR, [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> To: "Bob, K8LR" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 8:52 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: general Receivers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bob,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How does the sync detection compare with other radios such as the
>>>>>>>> Sony
>>>>>>>> 2010,
>>>>>>>> the Sony 7600 series, etc?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: "Bob, K8LR" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 00:09
>>>>>>>> Subject: general Receivers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Tecsun PL660 is not a professional receiver. It is a great
>>>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>>>> portable shortwave radio that has upper and lower side band modes
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> well
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> a synchronous A M detection mode for weak signal reception.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bob, K8LR, [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
|
