BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Date:
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:37:48 -0600
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Curtis Delzer <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<02.0C.03291.443284F4@louvi-msg>
Message-ID:
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
which version, they have a newer update which corrects, somewhat, 
this "pitch / tone," mix up. Personally, they should not fool with 
pitch when it comes to tone, but who knows why they wanted that 
so-called engineer to gain his fifteen minutes of fame, but it's just 
not rational to do that in any circumstances.

At 05:54 PM 2/24/2012, you wrote:
>I updated the firmware on my stream yesterday, but didn't try it out, but it
>was brought to my attention on the list. I just tried playing my notes
>folder and noticed the pitch problem. I wish these companies would make sure
>their updates work before they release them to the public.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2