BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:28:03 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<900C7D1FF40F4A5094F706F883544705@JohnPC>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<82.F6.03291.D9691EE4@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I'd agree with you, if it's working that well I'd just run the tuner until 
you get nicer weather, then adjust it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 12:03 AM
Subject: more on the imax-2000.


>I was able to make a 25 mile FM simplex contact on 29.6 tonight.  Then got 
>2
> S unit improvement reports comparing the imax to the zepp.  The same
> improvement was reported Over the 6 meter ringo.
> The SWR on 29.6 was 3/1, which I am not happy about, but not unhappy 
> enough
> to take the antenna down in the 15 DGF temperatures that are coming
> tomorrow.
> The tuner will just have to take care of that.
> H T Kaufman MSW LCSW
> Adaptive Technology Instructor 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2