Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:21:50 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you Geoff. Totally agree.
On Feb 24, 2014 11:15 PM, "Geoff Purcell" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I am always amazed at how some people can claim that a raw or cooked
> palaeolithic diet is too expensive. This just isn't so. For example, if
> one is near the coast, raw wildcaught seafood can be bought at very cheap
> prices(eg:- mackerel or sardines). If one finds grassfed muscle-meats too
> expensive, then one should instead buy the dirt-cheap grassfed organ-meats
> which nobody wants in the West, but which are, ironically, far more
> nutricious than any muscle-meats. Then there is the possibility of wild
> game, which I have been easily able to get hold of at much, much cheaper
> rates than grassfed meats, and the former are far higher in healthy
> nutrients as well.
>
> There are other savings.- if one is doing palaeo strictly, then cutting
> down on alcohol and smoking would help reduce daily costs, not to mention
> greatly reducing future expensive stays in hospital. Being strictly palaeo
> also means not eating sweets or chocolates or fizzy drinks/energy drinks or
> other processed/preprocessed "foods", which is another saving. Lastly, if
> one were to adopt the very palaeolithic dietary habit of Intermittent
> Fasting, then one would cut down on the overall amount of food bought
> while still staying healthy.
>
> Geoff
>
|
|
|