BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barbara Lombardi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:24:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
I can assure you that we will be on their case here in CT especially Betsey
who is SM for CT. (k1eic)  

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of richard fiorello
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 11:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Inaccessible Reader Medium for Ham Radio Publications

Hello;
Our radio club was visited by some arrl folks earlier this year and they
mentioned the digital qst upcoming next year.  I mentioned that it would be
a real plus if it could be accessed by a screen reader and although no
promises were made they sounded very positive.
Richard


----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Tice <[log in to unmask]>
To:  [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, Dec 16, 2011 06:10:21 PM
Subject: Inaccessible Reader Medium for Ham Radio Publications

>
>
> Greetings, Listers!
> 
> I've been away from the list for a while, mostly depending on the list 
> archives to help me answer questions Handiham members ask me.  Now I'm 
> = back again because I want to bring forward a troubling new 
> development. We = all know that we are on the cusp of a major change 
> in the publishing world.
> While digital publication can greatly enhance accessibility to blind 
> computer users, we cannot necessarily assume that new publishing 
> formats will necessarily be compliant with accepted accessibility 
> standards.  To illustrate this, I am pasting the following message 
> that I received from = the Zinio Support folks, then I will fill you 
> in a bit more.  Here is the e-mail:=20
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Thank you for contacting Zinio Customer Support.=20
> 
> Unfortunately Zinio publications are not compatible with screen 
> readers, = we apologize for the inconvenience.
> 
> If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Eric Folsom
> Zinio Customer Support
> 
> Okay, this is pretty much what I suspected because I was unable to = 
> highlight any text in the Zinio Reader, and the browser-based version 
> gave similar results.  However, the publications Zinio supports are 
> searchable for keywords, so there must be some sort of embedded text 
> underlying the graphical text presentation.  I am by no means a 
> screenreader user = myself since I can see the pages, but NVDA hadn't 
> a clue as to the main body = text in any of the pages when tested with 
> Worldradio Online Magazine, which = does use the Zinio system along 
> with CQ and many other magazines.  The Zinio Reader does include easy 
> to use font resizing, but the lack of = screenreader support is 
> troubling. =20
> 
> As I said, we are going to find more and more publications on line in 
> = the coming years, most sooner rather than later.  In the January 
> 2012 QST = there is a mention of the anticipated mid-year rollout of a 
> digital version of QST.  I want to emphasize that I have no 
> information on which publishing platform ARRL will be using and 
> whether it will be screenreader = accessible, but it is painfully 
> apparent that inaccessible design can be carried = forward into the 
> new publishing medium.  This is shown clearly in the step = backwards 
> from Worldradio Online in PDF with embedded text several issues ago = 
> prior to the change to the Zinio Reader versus the current "apologize 
> for the inconvenience" situation we have now.  =20
> 
> I don't fault the Worldradio Online people for this - they are simply 
> = using an on line publishing company.  And in fair disclosure, I do 
> write the = "With the Handihams" column that appears regularly in WR.  
> But I think that = any company that delivers online media, especially 
> digital print = publications for heaven's sake, should be able to 
> provide screenreader access.=20
> 
> Can we start a civil discussion about this, and put together some kind 
> = of informational message and action plan about what should be 
> expected regarding accessibility?  I know that the ADA does not 
> necessarily = require accessibility, but we all know that it is the 
> right thing to do, and = that it is also not a good business plan to 
> exclude potential readers.  =20
> 
> 73,
> Pat
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> Regards,=A0
> 
> Patrick Tice, M.A. | Manager, Courage Handiham System | PH: 
> 763.520.0511 =
> |
> Courage Center | 3915 Golden Valley Road | Golden Valley, MN 55422
> 
> [log in to unmask] | CourageCenter.org
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---=
> ---
> ---
> 
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
> and contains
> 
> confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized 
> disclosure, copy or distribution of this information is strictly 
> prohibited. If you = are not the intended recipient, please notify the 
> sender and delete this = e-mail.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2