BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 20-Meter Net, June 19
From:
tom behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:32:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (85 lines) 
    All:

It's looking to me like folks really do want lists of net participants if 
possible, so I'll continue to provide them for any of our nets for which I'm 
net control.

Thanks for all the great input.

73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Glen Schroeder" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: 20-Meter Net, June 19


dear tom and list.

i'm also in favor of the check ins for the nets being listed..

73 glen ka9yiu


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: 20-Meter Net, June 19


>    Lloyd and all:
>
> I guess posting the list of check-ins to our HF nets should be an idea
> that
> can be opened up for discussion.
>
> I always have done this for the nets I have run, because I think it's
> interesting for others to see who all of the net participants were.
>
> It also might be helpful for anyone who may not be sure whether or not
> they
> were heard.
>
> I would continue to argue in favor of publicizing check-in lists, but if
> that is not the will of the group, that is fine too.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
> - Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lloyd Rasmussen" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 6:05 PM
> Subject: 20-Meter Net, June 19
>
>
> I suppose some of you would rather we didn't post the lists of check-ins
> on
> the listserv.  We don't really have to do it.
>
> Conditions were OK today, but we missed K7RX and W6QUV.  Thank you to
> Butch
> and Junior for relaying some of the stations.  Check-ins on 14258 today
> were:
> W7OQ
> K0DDA
> WA0VJR
> KG4ITD
> W5VMP
> KW3A
> KB9ZUV
> W1MWB, Mike, Wells, Maine
> WD9GUT
> N9KIW
> K8LR
> KD0HOY
> K7UC
>
> I will attempt to call this net next Sunday, since it will be a couple
> hours
> after most Field Day stations have signed off.  I won't be around July 3.
> 73,
> Lloyd Rasmussen, W3IUU, Kensington, Maryland
> Home:  http://lras.home.sprynet.com
> Work:  http://www.loc.gov/nls

ATOM RSS1 RSS2