BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Leary <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:14:59 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (204 lines)
I have a 706mk2gii, and it has been in all kinds of conditions.  It hasn't 
failed in any way.  I also have a 7000 that blew out the drivers when it had 
3 hours on it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Best Beginner HF Transceiver


> There are parts in the IC-7000 and IC-706 not made anymore either, if you
> have one of the early 7000's so any radio, parts are likely to be
> discontinued at any time. I wouldn't let that be a deciding factor in a
> purchase necessarily.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bob Ray" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Best Beginner HF Transceiver
>
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Especially for someone just getting started the fact that you need to 
>> find
>> other sources for the speech board may be a bit of concern.  To more
>> concern
>> for me would be the fact that a number of other parts for the radios, the
>> 440, 450 and others, are hard to find.  This includes the display board.
>> I
>> had one go out on my 450 earlier this year and the service center that
>> looked at the radio recommended that I not try to replace it the labor 
>> and
>> materials were hard to come by and expensive.  In that case he pointed 
>> out
>> that as long as I didn't need someone to look at the display for any
>> reason
>> it certainly was still useable.  It is still a backup rig here. My
>> solution
>> was a used TS480/SAT to fill the void.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Bob
>> WA0KZB
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Howard, W A 9 Y B W" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 1:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: Best Beginner HF Transceiver
>>
>>
>> Steve,
>>
>> What speech board does the 440 use?
>>
>> If it's the VS-1, I believe I know a source for hundreds of them!!
>>
>> 73's
>>
>> Howard #3, W A 9 Y B W
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: Best Beginner HF Transceiver
>>
>>
>>>I would ste3er clear of the 440's, not because they were bad but you 
>>>can't
>>> easily find the speech boards for them any more, if memory serves.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 9:49 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Best Beginner HF Transceiver
>>>
>>>
>>>> One radio that isn't bad is the old Kenwood TS440sat.  It has direct
>>>> frequency input, you can put a speech synthesizer in it and get
>>>> Frequency
>>>> and Mode, and a lot of the functions are directly accessible with out
>>>> menus.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 11:49 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Best Beginner HF Transceiver
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't chimed in on this much yet.  Obviously, everybody wants to
>>>>> spend
>>>>> as little as possible.  Your message below gives me some guidance.
>>>>>
>>>>> As others have said, the best rigs in terms of accessibility are
>>>>> Kenwood,
>>>>> Icom, Eilcraft, and Yaesu pretty much in that order, although the 
>>>>> older
>>>>> Eilcraft did have an optional accessory to output readings in CW.  The
>>>>> newer
>>>>> Kenwood 480 and 590 speak everything; the Kenwood Ts-2000 speaks 
>>>>> almost
>>>>> everything except for actual power output and mike levels, although 
>>>>> the
>>>>> knob
>>>>> you use to adjust them has detents that beep at the high and low end.
>>>>> For
>>>>> example, on my rig, if I want about 60 watts drive for my linear amp, 
>>>>> I
>>>>> go
>>>>> to max and then turn the detented multichannel knob back about 8
>>>>> clicks.
>>>>>
>>>>> The TS-2000 is your best option for an all-in-one rig; it runs all
>>>>> modes
>>>>> on
>>>>> 160 through 440, with the exception of the 220MHz band.  There are
>>>>> several
>>>>> of us who can help with that rig.  It has a sub-receiver that runs
>>>>> VHF/UHF
>>>>> FM so you can work HF and monitor your favorite repeater.  It has the
>>>>> capability to work satellite.
>>>>>
>>>>> Icom also makes rigs that run Hf and VHF, but not as comprehensive.
>>>>> The
>>>>> higher end rigs from Kenwood and Icom, like the TS-590, only run up
>>>>> through
>>>>> six meters 54MHz.  Just about every new rig has built-in tuners, and
>>>>> several
>>>>> have built-in keyer.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you bought a lower-end rig, I think that sooner or later, you might
>>>>> want
>>>>> additional features like better filtering, noise reduction, and
>>>>> selectivity.
>>>>> You could save a few bucks if you bought something used that is in 
>>>>> very
>>>>> good
>>>>> condition.
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve, K8SP
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "David thurmond" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 8:13 AM
>>>>> Subject: Best Beginner HF Transceiver
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your feedback regarding transceiver choices.  I should 
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> given a few more specifics.  First off, I would prefer not to break
>>>>>> the bank if possible.  If I try to spend $2000 on a new rig, my stuff
>>>>>> might end up out on the front lawn, and I might need to get an
>>>>>> attorney. :)  I would like to find a rig that might not necessarily 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> full of features in favor of one that is either accessible with 
>>>>>> speech
>>>>>> or else is easy enough to operate without it for a totally blind ham.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Kenwood 480 is an awesome-sounding rig, but if I have to wait to
>>>>>> save up to buy one, I might never get on the air.  At the same time, 
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> would hate to cheap out and buy something that is so basic that I 
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> be tired of using it after six months and end up buying something 
>>>>>> else
>>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am very interested in CW, and of course in DXing as well, so I am
>>>>>> primarily interested in the HF bands, but if I could get something
>>>>>> with VHF capabilities also for a little more money, I am certainly 
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> going to turn it down.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Operating with low power would be perfectly fine with me, as I am
>>>>>> probably going to end up using some sort of stealth antenna due to 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> small size of my property and the fact that I'm right in the middle 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> a busy suburb.  No need for a "big guns" sort of station with a
>>>>>> 200-foot tower...I just want something modest with enough features to
>>>>>> get me started without breaking the bank.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The speech output options of the Kenwood and ICom rigs sound very
>>>>>> attractive, as I don't want to run my rig exclusively through my
>>>>>> laptop.  But since I have not even been on the air yet, perhaps this
>>>>>> is not really as important as I think it is.  I certainly need to be
>>>>>> sure I am not operating out-of-band, and I need to be able to know
>>>>>> what kind of signal I am getting.  Beyond that, I really do not have
>>>>>> the experience to know what is important for me to operate, and what
>>>>>> is really just an awesome feature that would be nice to have, but not
>>>>>> critical.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Thurmond, KK4ADV 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2