Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:25:46 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'd go no worse than 9913 coax, those antennas don't have much gain so you
need to make sure as much power gets to them as possible plus I wouldn't go
any less than that on vhf/uhf anyway, and personally I prefer LMR400 or
higher if the money allows but I tend to go all out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Simpson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 1:50 PM
Subject: Coax recommendations.
> Hi, Everyone.
> A friend in my radio club is willing to lend me a Discone antenna
> for 144, 220, and 440 mhz. He is also willing to help me mount it on the
> roof of my house. I'm wondring if anyone can recommend the best kind of
> coax
> for low line loss that is also water-proofed. I figure I'll need somewhere
> between 30 and 50 feet of it. Also, does anyone have a sugggestion for the
> best place to get a good price on it.
>
> Thanks much and 73,
>
> Dave W I 3 Y
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Dave Marthouse
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 2:08 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Notes On Accessible Satellite Tracking
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> It's interesting to note that two of the top programs for sat tracking
> under
> dos were fully speech-friendly. QuikTrak was my favorite but I in
> addition
> was able to use Instanttrack as well.
>
> I was quite active on the high orbit birds. AO-10 and AO13 were fun and
> interesting satellites.
>
>
> Dave Marthouse N2AAM
> [log in to unmask]
|
|
|