BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
tom behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:03:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
    Butch:

This is an important finding. ... Please let us know what you discover as 
you work more with the rig.

Once I get things up and running here, I'll provide the output power 
readings I get.

Hopefully, some of the others who have 590's can do the same.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: 590 question


I just found another strange thing.  With my tw1 on cw and rtty, I only
show 75 watts without the tuner into a dummy load and 68 with the tuner
in line.  Switching to the 2000, nothing else changed, the tw1 shows 97
watts.  I have the transmit power set to 100, I wonder if there is an
internal adjustment.  Guess I'd better try my luck at getting on the 590
list.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.


On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ed Malmgren wrote:

> Butch, it is a real interesting radio and it is much smarter than I am but
> wats new hi.  73
> Ed   K7UC
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 9:03 PM
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Fw: 590 question
>
>> I read the manual, but don't remember that.  It certainly is an
>> interesting radio.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> 73
>> Butch
>> WA0VJR
>> Node 3148
>> Wallace, ks.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2