PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:35:48 +0100
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<032501ccf52a$cea47e20$6bed7a60$@it>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<01e101ccf31e$cf89e130$6e9da390$@ca>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Emiliano Bussolo <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
>Hi Emiliano,
>I don't understand Creationism enough to defend or attack it.

It's not that complicated really...

>The theory of evolution provides better evidence against Paleo eating
>than
>Creationism does. 

Evidence?  

The whole one-diet-fits-all Paleo paradigm is easily
>discredited by evolution but not Creationism.
>For instance, those who can trace their genes to the Fertile Crescent
>about
>10,000 years ago might argue that they have had sufficient time to adapt
>to
>wheat consumption. And they might be right.

No. In evolution terms 10.000 years are not so many really. 

 
 
 --
 Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Conto Arancio al 4,20%. Soldi sempre disponibili, zero spese, aprilo in due minuti!
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=11920&d=27-2

ATOM RSS1 RSS2