BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Feb 2012 03:11:54 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (224 lines)
Hi
     Well, sometimes people just post the items to the list here. Smile.
What is a DoubleTalk LT?

God bless,
Mark

God Loves you!
You can visit my website at:
http://christiantraditions.info
Please visit my blog at:
http://christian-traditions.blogspot.com

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Scott Howell
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 3:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OT victor reader stream

Hey reading all this about book readers etc got me thinking. I have the =
original APH Bookport and an external DoubleTalk LT. I do not need =
either and would like to get a couple bucks for these things and find =
them a new home. So, is there somewhere one could post stuff like this =
without having to join another list?

THanks,
73
Scott/N3BYY

On Feb 25, 2012, at 11:53 PM, Curtis Delzer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> the best tone control I have ever seen in my over fifty years or=20
> reading books is on the digital NLS player. they sure got that one=20
> right. Now, if they just leave it alone? :) like Victor did not?
> Great heavens! I cannot believe they would confuse tone with an audio=20=

> frequency distortion of analog pitch!  Seems the algorithm which=20
> compensates for the speed change has enough to do without double=20
> compensating for both the speed and pitch when altering the "tone"=20
> setting. Ridiculous with a capital R, and I truly am astounded that=20
> whomever did this, has any idea about what in the world they are=20
> doing, let alone have proper education as to what a "tone" control =
does.
> As in the case of the NLS digital player, you brighten up the highs=20
> when going up, and deepen and accentuate the bass when going down,=20
> not, in any way, change the pitch of the voice, period.  If you're=20
> going to mess with the analog pitch, in any digital player, it has to=20=

> be an algorithm, since pitch, itself is a manifestation of the sample=20=

> rate at which the file was recorded.  You can just use another sample=20=

> rate to play back, say 30000 instead of 22,050Hz or, 18000, etc, and=20=

> you'll get your pitch change.  However, most of the time I'd want=20
> pitch accuracy, after all, isn't the intent to have as little=20
> "distortion," of the signal as possible, a desired item in a digital=20=

> audio transfer to the speaker, and thereby, the end user?
> Anyway, this multi-faceted  tone control with it's tilting pitch=20
> distortion, has ruined the ability of the Victor Stream to properly=20
> tilt the audio equalization toward just brightening up the high end,=20=

> by changing the pitch of the voice which just raises the high end of=20=

> the voice by increasing the pitch which is a cheap attempt to gain in=20=

> high pitch for audio compensation.
> Flummery! truly, flummery!  And, these are audio engineers? I ask you!
> Go back to school, guys, at Victor, and take a lesson from the=20
> designers of the NLS digital player in how to manipulate a tone =
control.
> As I say, and will say again, they, truly, got, it, right!
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> At 02:59 PM 2/25/2012, Lloyd Rasmussen wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dave Basden [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 12:37 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: FW: OT victor reader stream
>>=20
>> The problem is that the frequency response on books converted from
>> tape varies so much that the tone control is necessary to
>> compensate.  They could eaqsily make the power button cycle through
>> gain, speed, tone, and pitch instead of just gain, speed, and tone.
>>=20
>> Dave, W7OQ
>>=20
>> At 07:42 AM 2/25/2012, you wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Lou Kolb [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:00 PM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: OT victor reader stream
>>>=20
>>> Lloyd,
>>>=20
>>> The problem is not pitch changing with speed, rather when in the =
tone
>>> control mode on the stream,  the pitch changes instead of the tone.  =
Don't
>>> know for sure but I can't imagine thay did that deliberately.
>>> Lou Kolb
>>> Voice-over Artist:
>>> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
>>> Messages On-hold:
>>> www.loukolb.com
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Lloyd Rasmussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 7:42 PM
>>> Subject: Re: OT victor reader stream
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> I think that this pitch change with speed increase is intentional.
>> Someone
>>>> may like it.  It also means that the time-scale modification =
algorithm
>>>> doesn't have to work quite as hard, thus chopping the audio up a =
bit
>> less.
>>>> A long time ago, as the NISO standard was being written and we were
>>>> discussing playback device features, there was some sentiment that =
we
>>>> should
>>>> recommend the ability to adjust the pitch separately from the
>>>> time-scale-modified speed.  This didn't make it into the NLS =
player.  I
>>>> think it's in one of the iPhone apps, perhaps for Learning Ally.
>> Someone
>>>> should make a recording so others will know how big a change it is, =
and
>>>> whether it will bother them.
>>>> 73,
>>>> Lloyd Rasmussen, W3IUU, Wheaton, Maryland
>>>> Home:  http://lras.home.sprynet.com
>>>> Work:  http://www.loc.gov/nls
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Lou Kolb
>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 6:35 PM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: OT victor reader stream
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I just wrote to Bob Martin privately but there seems to be enough
>>>>> interest
>>>>> to just mention it here also.  Ok, here's the scoop.  The update =
went
>>>>> flawlessly but when i resumed reading my book, I noticed that the =
pitch
>>>>> was
>>>>> a bit high.  just like in the good old days when we put up with =
pitch
>>>>> change
>>>>> to gain some speed.  I recalled that one of the new features was =
the
>> new
>>>>> tone algorithm thay are also using in the Victor Stratus.  So I =
went to
>>>>> the
>>>>> tone control and zeroed it out and voila, the pitch returned to =
normal.
>>>>> This made me feel a lot better since I wouldn't have to put up =
with
>>>>> slightly
>>>>> raised pitch but neither can I adjust the tone as before.  The =
pitch
>> does
>>>>> change as it's now supposed to for text-to-speech material but I =
don't
>>>>> think
>>>>> they intended it to on audio.  I'll let you know as I continue to
>> tinker.
>>>>> Lou  WA3MIX
>>>>> Lou Kolb
>>>>> Voice-over Artist:
>>>>> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
>>>>> Messages On-hold:
>>>>> www.loukolb.com
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 5:57 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: OT victor reader stream
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Why not.  We never stay on topic.  Personally, I'm interested as =
I
>>>>>> haven't updated mine yet.  Write privately if you wish.
>>>>>> 73
>>>>>> Butch
>>>>>> WA0VJR
>>>>>> Node 3148
>>>>>> Wallace, ks.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On Fri, 24 Feb
>>>>>> 2012, Lou Kolb wrote:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> i've just updated my stream to the latest firmware and have =
noticed
>> an
>>>>>>> oddity.  I'd like to discuss this but not on this list as it's =
way
>>>>>>> off-topic.  Please contact me directly at:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> Thanks and 73,  lou   WA3MIX
>>>>>>> Lou Kolb
>>>>>>> Voice-over Artist:
>>>>>>> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
>>>>>>> Messages On-hold:
>>>>>>> www.loukolb.com
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20

ATOM RSS1 RSS2