BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:13:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
I can say the 120 is that way.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: Least Expensive Way To Go HF


> Hi Eric,
>
> You're right. The 120, 130, 520, 530, etc. etc are too old to have =
> speech synthesizers, but who cares? At least in the case of the =
> '520/820/830, there's a perfectly usable crystal callibrator, and you =
> can for sure tell hwo far you've gone by counting dial revolutions. =
> Pretty sure the same applies to the 120/130. These are of course all ham =
> bands only radios, no WARC.=20
> --
> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
>
>
>
> On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Eric Clegg wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> All of these are nice rigs but I don't believe there are any speech=20
>> synthesizer boards available for the erly Kenwoods.
>>=20
>> If you can find a Kenwood TS50 I believe it will work with a Millenium =
> Qsyer=20
>> with a slight modification to the rig.
>>=20
>> 73,
>>=20
>> Eric Clegg
>> KU3I
>>=20
>>=20
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus =
> signature database 6082 (20110429) __________
>>=20
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>=20
>> http://www.eset.com 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2