I agree, Tom. I have both the two and the three, also. I like them
both,but the two is far superior to the three in my opinion.
I have seen a couple of the C Crane radios and I'm not that impressed. I'll
take the super radios over them any day. I think the C Crane are way over
priced. When you see what GE was able to do with the two and three for a
really reasonable price and, you compare them to the C Crane radios at much
higher prices, for me it is not worth it.
Kris
----- Original Message -----
From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
> Well, I have a 3 and a 2 here, and will use that 2 until it doesn't play
> any more! (grin)
>
> And, I do think the sound of the 2 is far better than the 3.
>
> The base and trebble controls really make a difference on the 2, while on
> the 3, they are marginal.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:11 PM
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>
> I have a 3 here. It's ok but from what I understand, the 2 was the one to
> have. The Secrane radios seem to perform well but I doubt they sound as
> good as the super radios since they don't have that big case and speaker.
> Lou
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tom behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:57 AM
> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>
>
>> Wow, that is really troubling!
>>
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 8:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: bitter disappointment!
>>
>>
>> It looks the same, but far worse than the GE 3.
|