Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:16:17 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
that's why I prefer my radios so I can work them from the front panel,
programming them I don't mind with a computer, but if I have to do that,
I'll take a commercial radio and get the good quality instead of having to
program ham gear that way because I can't do it from the radio.
----- Original Message -----
From: "don bishop" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: D-star?
> Tom,
>
> You're absolutely right on with your comments. And, your term
> "workaround" really tells it like it is.
>
> Don w6smb
>
>
>
> On 9/17/2010 1:19 PM, Tom Brennan wrote:
>> Martin, you entirely missed my point. As it happens, I am not a windoze
>> user
>> but that's not the point at all. My point is what people are calling
>> "accessibility" is not accessibility but rather a work around. If it
>> requires a
>> separate computer for me to operate my radio or any other piece of
>> equipment
>> that is not accessibility of the equipment. It is only accessability of
>> the
>> software and the basic equipment still remains inaccessible. Personally
>> I want
>> to be able to use a product without being tied to my computer in order to
>> do it.
>> Otherwise, you can do nothing if your computer goes down and everything
>> becomes
>> inaccessible. Its a little like going to somewhere where the
>> computerized cash
>> register is down and the people on duty are not capable of making change
>> by
>> hand.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
>> web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
>>
>> __________ NOD32 5458 (20100917) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
|
|
|