BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The listserv where the buildings do the talking <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:21:42 -0400
Reply-To:
The listserv where the buildings do the talking <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<007d01cae543$6b6c2720$ec0aa8c0@roadster>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Rudy R Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Steve asked:

>How about "nonlinear cross-anisotropic behavior"?<

I tend to focus more on the modulus of rupture. It's one thing to exceed the
limits of the modulus of elasticity and end up no longer being comfortable
that your old friend elasticity will keep things where they belong and that
mean old plastic set occurs, but piling it on to the point where the modulus
of rupture is exceeded might mean loosing a perfectly good client...quite
literally.

I've always found it interesting that failure in bending in an anisotropic
material like wood occurs as compressive failure first and tensile failure
second. It make sense when you look at the numbers but is counter intuitive
in the real world when observing broken beams in old wooden structures.

Rude E 

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2